Sis six.1. Final results and Evaluation 6.1. Comparison of of your FE using the Test Results thethe Time and frequency Domain at Unique 6. FEComparison the FE with all the Test Benefits in in Time and Frequency Domain at Distinct Places Locationsv = 270 km/h, the vibration velocities in the track slab, test final results. For train speed v pile aft 270 km/h, the vibration velocities at the track slab, roadbed, embankment, and = pileIn this section, the FE final results are compared with the roadbed, embankment, and raft foundation vibration Bryostatin 1 supplier velocitiesthe the track slab,model. embankment, and pile aft foundation were calculated ininat numerical model. 270 km/h, the have been calculated the numerical roadbed, Figure wereb,d,f,h,j show the frequency domain evaluation results corresponding the Figure 17 calculated the frequency model. foundation17b,d,f,h,j showin the numerical domain evaluation results corresponding to towards the vibration velocity time show the frequency domain analysis outcomes corresponding shows the Figure 17 b,d,f,h,j histories in Figure 16a,c,e,g,i, respectively. Figure 17a for the vibration velocity time histories in Figure 16a,c,e,g,i, respectively. Figure 17a shows the time history of in the vibration velocity in the trackrespectively. Figurethe train moving at a vibration velocity time histories in Figurethe track slab induced byby 17a shows the at a time history the vibration velocity at 16a,c,e,g,i, slab induced the train moving speed of of 270 km/h. The amplitudes on the vibration velocities are 41.48 mm/s inside the FE time historykm/h. vibration velocity on the track slab induced byare 41.48 movingin the FE speed 270 of your The amplitudes in the vibration velocities the train mm/s at a speed of information and 32 mm/s inin the the vibration velocities are 41.48 mm/s in thecontents simulation 270data and 32amplitudes of model test data. In Figure 17b, the frequency contents simulation km/h. The mm/s the model test information. In Figure 17b, the frequency FE model test ofsimulation datavelocity for the themodel test data.FE Figure 17b, the frequencysame dominant the vibration and 32 mm/s in model test and FE In simulation present the contents in the vibration velocity for the and simulation present precisely the same dominant of your vibration velocity for the model ranges. The majority of the spectral energy ofdominant simulation frequencies inside particular frequency test and FEMost of thepresent the same of the vibration frequencies inside specific frequency ranges. spectral energy the vibration frequencies within certain frequency ranges. Most of3, 9, spectral Hz. These 3 dominant velocity is concentrated at in the frequency of about three, and 27 27 Hz. These vibration the frequency of regarding the 9, and power in the 3 dominant velocity is concentrated the frequency velocity is concentrated atthe passing frequency three, the train carriage geometry (l = 25 m), frequencies correspond to to the passing of about of 9, and 27 Hz. These 3 dominant= 25 m), c frequencies frequency oftrain train carriage geometry (lc the carriage frequencies correspond the passing frequencym), reflecting the characteristic 25 m), bogie (lab = = correspondaxle distance (lwb wb = two.5of thereflecting the geometry (lc =frequencies 7.five m), and to = two.five m), bogie (l 7.five m), and axle distance = characteristic frequencies bogie (labab= 7.5 m), and axle distance (lwb (l two.5 m), reflecting the characteristic frequencies of the train compartment. with the train compartment. on the train compartment.60 60 40 40 20 two.
