On of first draft in the manuscript. C.-L.C. contributed
On of very first draft of the manuscript. C.-L.C. contributed to verification of information. G.H.-Y.L., S.K.-K.L., I.C.-K.W., J.K.-P.C. and C.-L.C. contributed for the interpretation of final results and writing with the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed for the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This investigation received no external funding. Institutional Evaluation Board Statement: All the GWAS/GWAS meta-analysis from which the summary statistics had been extracted from had obtained ethics approval from the respective institutional assessment board. Informed Consent Statement: All of the GWAS/GWAS meta-analysis from which the summary statistics were extracted from had obtained informed consent in the study participants. Information Availability Statement: Summary statistics of genetic instruments can be obtained in the web sites listed on the referenced GWAS or GWAS meta-analysis. Acknowledgments: We express our gratitude to all study participants of your respective GWAS/GWAS meta-analysis from which the summary statistics of this study have been obtained from. Conflicts of Interest: We declare no possible conflict of interest.
Journal ofClinical MedicineArticleRobotic vs. Transsternal Thymectomy: A Single Center Expertise over 10 YearsLuis Filipe Azenha 1, , Robin Deckarm 1, , Fabrizio Bromophenol blue manufacturer Minervini two , Patrick Dorn 1 , Jon Lutz 1 and Gregor Jan Kocher 1, Division of Basic Thoracic Surgery, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; [email protected] (L.F.A.); [email protected] (R.D.); [email protected] (P.D.); [email protected] (J.L.) Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland; [email protected] Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +41-31-632-37-45 The authors contributed equally to this manuscript.Citation: Azenha, L.F.; Deckarm, R.; Minervini, F.; Dorn, P.; Lutz, J.; Kocher, G.J. Robotic vs. Transsternal Thymectomy: A Single Center Experience over 10 Years. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4991. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jcm10214991 Academic Editors: Monica Casiraghi and Luca Bertolaccini Received: 27 September 2021 Accepted: 25 October 2021 Published: 27 OctoberAbstract: Introduction: Thymomas will be the most typical tumors of the mediastinum. Traditionally, thymectomies have already been performed by way of a transsternal (TS) strategy. With the development of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), a promising, minimally invasive, alternative surgical technique for performing a thymectomy has been created. Inside the existing paper, the oncological and surgical outcomes on the TS vs. RATS thymectomies are discussed. Methods: For the RATS thymectomy, two 8 mm operating ports and one 12 mm camera port were utilised. Within the transsternal approach, we performed a median sternotomy and resected the thymic tissue totally, in some situations en bloc with aspect in the lung and/or, far more regularly, a partial pericardiectomy with consequent reconstruction utilizing a bovine pericardial patch. The choices for utilizing the TS vs. RATS procedures were primarily based on the suspected tumor invasion from the surrounding structures on the preoperative CT scan and tumor size. Final results: In between January 2010 and November 2020, 149 sufferers had been submitted for an Cysteinylglycine Purity & Documentation anterior mediastinal tumor resection at our institution. A total of 104 individuals met the inclusion criteria. A single process was performed by way of a hemi-clamshell incision. A total of 81 (78 ) patients underwent RATS procedures, and 22 (21.1 ) individuals had been treat.
