Of the E. coli genome sequences, aligned these genes by Muscle, concatenated them, and built a maximum likelihood tree under the GTR model using RaxML, as outlined previously45. Due to the size of this tree, bootstrapping was not carried out, although we have previously performed bootstrapping using these concatenated sequences on a subset of genomes which shows high support for the principal branches45. Phylogenetic estimation of phylogroup A E. coli.To produce a robust phylogeny for phylogroup A E. coli that could be used to interrogate the relatedness A-836339 site between MPEC and other E. coli, we queried our pan-genome data (see below for method) to identify 1000 random core genes from the 533 phylogroup A genomes, and aligned each of these sequences using Muscle. We then investigated the likelihood that recombination CEP-37440 manufacturer affected the phylogenetic signature in each of these genes using the Phi test46. Sequences which either showed significant evidence for recombination (p < 0.05), or were too short to be used in the Phi test, were excluded. This yielded 520 putatively non-recombining genes which were used for further analysis. These genes are listed by their MG1655 "b" number designations in Additional Table 2. The sequences for these 520 genes were concatenated for each strain. The Gblocks program was used to eliminate poorly aligned regions47, and the resulting 366312 bp alignment used to build a maximum likelihood tree based on the GTR substitution model using RaxML with 100 bootstrap replicates45.MethodPhylogenetic tree visualisation and statistical analysis of molecular diversity. Phylogenetic trees estimated by RaxML were midpoint rooted using MEGA 548 and saved as Newick format. Trees were imported into R49. The structure of the trees were explored using the `ade4' package50, and visualised using the `ape' package51. To produce a tree formed by only MPEC isolates, the phylogroup A tree was treated to removed non-MPEC genomes using the `drop.tip' function within the `ape' package- this tree was not calculated de novo. To investigate molecular diversity of strains, branch lengths in the phylogenetic tree were converted into a distance matrix using the `cophenetic.phylo' function within the `ape' package, and the average distance between the target genomes (either all MPEC or country groups) was calculated and recorded. Over 100,000 replications, a random sample of the same number of target genomes were selected (66 for MPEC analysis, or the number ofScientific RepoRts | 6:30115 | DOI: 10.1038/srepwww.nature.com/scientificreports/isolates from each country), and the average distance between these random genomes was calculated. The kernel density estimate for this distribution was then calculation using the `density' function within R, and the actual distance observed for the target genomes compared with this distribution. To calculate the likelihood that the actual distance observed between the target genomes was generated by chance; the p value was calculated by the proportion of random distances which were as small, or smaller than, the actual distance. Significance was set at a threshold of 5 . To estimate the pan-genome of phylogroup A E. coli, we predicted the gene content for each of the 533 genomes using Prodigal52. We initially attempted to elaborate the pan-genome using an all-versus-all approach used by other studies and programs53?8, however the number of genomes used in our analysis proved prohibitive for the computing resources av.Of the E. coli genome sequences, aligned these genes by Muscle, concatenated them, and built a maximum likelihood tree under the GTR model using RaxML, as outlined previously45. Due to the size of this tree, bootstrapping was not carried out, although we have previously performed bootstrapping using these concatenated sequences on a subset of genomes which shows high support for the principal branches45. Phylogenetic estimation of phylogroup A E. coli.To produce a robust phylogeny for phylogroup A E. coli that could be used to interrogate the relatedness between MPEC and other E. coli, we queried our pan-genome data (see below for method) to identify 1000 random core genes from the 533 phylogroup A genomes, and aligned each of these sequences using Muscle. We then investigated the likelihood that recombination affected the phylogenetic signature in each of these genes using the Phi test46. Sequences which either showed significant evidence for recombination (p < 0.05), or were too short to be used in the Phi test, were excluded. This yielded 520 putatively non-recombining genes which were used for further analysis. These genes are listed by their MG1655 "b" number designations in Additional Table 2. The sequences for these 520 genes were concatenated for each strain. The Gblocks program was used to eliminate poorly aligned regions47, and the resulting 366312 bp alignment used to build a maximum likelihood tree based on the GTR substitution model using RaxML with 100 bootstrap replicates45.MethodPhylogenetic tree visualisation and statistical analysis of molecular diversity. Phylogenetic trees estimated by RaxML were midpoint rooted using MEGA 548 and saved as Newick format. Trees were imported into R49. The structure of the trees were explored using the `ade4' package50, and visualised using the `ape' package51. To produce a tree formed by only MPEC isolates, the phylogroup A tree was treated to removed non-MPEC genomes using the `drop.tip' function within the `ape' package- this tree was not calculated de novo. To investigate molecular diversity of strains, branch lengths in the phylogenetic tree were converted into a distance matrix using the `cophenetic.phylo' function within the `ape' package, and the average distance between the target genomes (either all MPEC or country groups) was calculated and recorded. Over 100,000 replications, a random sample of the same number of target genomes were selected (66 for MPEC analysis, or the number ofScientific RepoRts | 6:30115 | DOI: 10.1038/srepwww.nature.com/scientificreports/isolates from each country), and the average distance between these random genomes was calculated. The kernel density estimate for this distribution was then calculation using the `density' function within R, and the actual distance observed for the target genomes compared with this distribution. To calculate the likelihood that the actual distance observed between the target genomes was generated by chance; the p value was calculated by the proportion of random distances which were as small, or smaller than, the actual distance. Significance was set at a threshold of 5 . To estimate the pan-genome of phylogroup A E. coli, we predicted the gene content for each of the 533 genomes using Prodigal52. We initially attempted to elaborate the pan-genome using an all-versus-all approach used by other studies and programs53?8, however the number of genomes used in our analysis proved prohibitive for the computing resources av.
