Rains, including ST398, ST9, and ST5, to form biofilms. We then compared the biofilms formed by these strains to biofilms formed by MSSA and MRSA laboratory strains as well as clinical HA-MRSA (USA100) and CA-MRSA (USA300) strains. All LA-MRSA strains tested here formed robust biofilms similarly to human clinical isolates, including two OPC-8212 biological activity USA300 isolates. Moreover, no statistical differences were observed between any isolates and MLST types tested. To gain further insight into the mechanisms responsible for biofilm development in LA-MRSA strains, we tested whether enzymes targeting different components of the biofilm matrix (protein, extracellular DNA or the polysaccharide PNAG, respectively) could inhibit biofilm formation, disperse established mature biofilms, or both. Enzymes and enzyme mixtures have been proposed for use in the elimination of biofilms from both abiotic and biotic surfaces; however it is important to take into account the makeup of the particular type of biofilm being targeted [76], as these enzymes can have varying effects on biofilms from different bacterial species and even between strains of a single species [60,77,78]. Additionally, compounds that have been shown to be effective at reducing biofilms of other Staphylococcus species, such as S. epidermidis, may not be as effective when targeting S. aureus biofilms. Our results demonstrate that Proteinase K inhibited biofilm formation and caused significant detachment of mature biofilms in nearly all S. aureus strains tested, including LA-MRSA isolates. Our findings agree with prior results demonstrating the sensitivity of S. aureus biofilms to Proteinase K [60,63,76,77,79]. An interesting exception is strain USA300, for which Proteinase K did not inhibit biofilm formation, but was able to disperse mature biofilms. Specifically, we found Proteinase K inhibited biofilm formation in all S. aureus strains tested, including TCH1516, a USA300-type strain (ST8, spa type t008, community-associated MRSA from humans) isolated from a different SF 1101MedChemExpress LY294002 source, except for strain USA300, which was the only strain not sensitive to Proteinase K treatment at the time of inoculation. Perhaps this USA300 strain is able to overcome the effect of Proteinase K during biofilm formation by modulating expression of other components during formation of the biofilm matrix. Phenotypic differences such as this can occur even in MRSA strains of the same MLST type and demonstrate that MLST and spa type do not indicate a clonal lineage, rather a family of similar strains. The origin of individual MRSA isolates is thought to be the result of multiple evolution events from a progenitor strain and/or divergence andPLOS ONE | www.plosone.orgSwine MRSA Isolates form Robust BiofilmsFigure 4. Inhibition of biofilm formation by DspB. S. aureus strains tested are shown along the x-axis and grouped based on methicillin-sensitivity and isolation source. S. epidermidis (S. epi) strains tested are shown along the x-axis and grouped together. The indicated strains were grown statically for 24 hours in media alone (- DspB) or in media supplemented with 40 /ml DspB (+ DspB). Biofilm formation was quantified by standard microtiter assays and measuring the absorbance at 538 nm, plotted along the y-axis. Bars represent the average absorbance obtained from at least 3 independent plates representing biological replicates; error bars represent the SEM. Asterisks (*) denote a p-value less than 0.05 between the treated and untr.Rains, including ST398, ST9, and ST5, to form biofilms. We then compared the biofilms formed by these strains to biofilms formed by MSSA and MRSA laboratory strains as well as clinical HA-MRSA (USA100) and CA-MRSA (USA300) strains. All LA-MRSA strains tested here formed robust biofilms similarly to human clinical isolates, including two USA300 isolates. Moreover, no statistical differences were observed between any isolates and MLST types tested. To gain further insight into the mechanisms responsible for biofilm development in LA-MRSA strains, we tested whether enzymes targeting different components of the biofilm matrix (protein, extracellular DNA or the polysaccharide PNAG, respectively) could inhibit biofilm formation, disperse established mature biofilms, or both. Enzymes and enzyme mixtures have been proposed for use in the elimination of biofilms from both abiotic and biotic surfaces; however it is important to take into account the makeup of the particular type of biofilm being targeted [76], as these enzymes can have varying effects on biofilms from different bacterial species and even between strains of a single species [60,77,78]. Additionally, compounds that have been shown to be effective at reducing biofilms of other Staphylococcus species, such as S. epidermidis, may not be as effective when targeting S. aureus biofilms. Our results demonstrate that Proteinase K inhibited biofilm formation and caused significant detachment of mature biofilms in nearly all S. aureus strains tested, including LA-MRSA isolates. Our findings agree with prior results demonstrating the sensitivity of S. aureus biofilms to Proteinase K [60,63,76,77,79]. An interesting exception is strain USA300, for which Proteinase K did not inhibit biofilm formation, but was able to disperse mature biofilms. Specifically, we found Proteinase K inhibited biofilm formation in all S. aureus strains tested, including TCH1516, a USA300-type strain (ST8, spa type t008, community-associated MRSA from humans) isolated from a different source, except for strain USA300, which was the only strain not sensitive to Proteinase K treatment at the time of inoculation. Perhaps this USA300 strain is able to overcome the effect of Proteinase K during biofilm formation by modulating expression of other components during formation of the biofilm matrix. Phenotypic differences such as this can occur even in MRSA strains of the same MLST type and demonstrate that MLST and spa type do not indicate a clonal lineage, rather a family of similar strains. The origin of individual MRSA isolates is thought to be the result of multiple evolution events from a progenitor strain and/or divergence andPLOS ONE | www.plosone.orgSwine MRSA Isolates form Robust BiofilmsFigure 4. Inhibition of biofilm formation by DspB. S. aureus strains tested are shown along the x-axis and grouped based on methicillin-sensitivity and isolation source. S. epidermidis (S. epi) strains tested are shown along the x-axis and grouped together. The indicated strains were grown statically for 24 hours in media alone (- DspB) or in media supplemented with 40 /ml DspB (+ DspB). Biofilm formation was quantified by standard microtiter assays and measuring the absorbance at 538 nm, plotted along the y-axis. Bars represent the average absorbance obtained from at least 3 independent plates representing biological replicates; error bars represent the SEM. Asterisks (*) denote a p-value less than 0.05 between the treated and untr.
