Ve measure of participants’ socioeconomic status (SES). This index takes into account both parents’ educational levels, occupation, and marital status, based on self report. Computed scores ranged from 8 to 66, with a higher score indicating a higher socioeconomic status. 2.2. Measurement of speech fluency Measurement of participants’ speech fluency was based on a 300-word conversational speech sample, obtained during free play between the child and the examiner, and scores on the Stuttering Severity Instrument-3 (SSI-3; Riley, 1994). Scores on the SSI-3 were based on one continuous 300-word conversational speech sample. All disfluency and word counts were obtained in real-time with the examiner noting the disfluent and fluent words on a disfluency count sheet (Conture, 2001) while playing and conversing with the child. Present study guidelines for assessing speech BIM-22493 cost disfluencies were such that only one disfluency type (e.g., sound/syllable repetition) could be applied to a single word. If two or more stuttered disfluencies (for examples, see below) occurred on the same word (e.g., disfluency cluster “sound prolongation + sound/syllable repetition”), only one instance of stuttered disfluency, that is, the first disfluency to occur on the word, was documented/4Apparent between-group difference in gender as well as other relevant variables (e.g., age) will be accounted for in statistical model presented in Section 3. J Commun Disord. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 May 01.Tumanova et al.Pagecounted for. Phrase repetitions or revisions (which are classified in this study as nonstuttered/normal disfluencies; for examples, see below) occur on units larger than single words. Thus, if a stuttered and a Pepstatin A web non-stuttered disfluency occurred within the same phrase (e.g., a sound prolongation on one word of phrase revision), both were counted (see Yaruss, 1998a,b). All examiner-child interactions were audio-video recorded for several purposes, including inter- and intra-judge measurement reliability, to be described below. 2.3. Classification and inclusion criteria All participants’ speech-language and hearing abilities were assessed using standardized measures. In particular, the “Sounds in Words” subtest of the Goldman ristoe Test of Articulation-2 (GFTA-2; Goldman Fristoe, 2000) assessed children’s articulation. Receptive vocabulary was measured using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition (PPVT-4; Dunn Dunn, 2007). Expressive vocabulary was measured using the Expressive Vocabulary Test (EVT-2; Williams, 2007). Receptive and expressive language abilities of the participants were evaluated using the Test of Early Language Development-3 (TELD-3; Hresko, Reid, Hammill, 1999). In addition, all participants received a bilateral pure tone hearing screening to rule out hearing impairments. Participants were assigned to the CWS group if they (a) exhibited three or more stuttered disfluencies (i.e., sound/syllable repetitions, sound prolongations, or monosyllabic wholeword repetitions) per 100 words of conversational speech (Conture, 2001; Yaruss, 1998a,b) based on a 300-word speech sample, and (b) scored 11 or greater (i.e., severity of at least “mild”) on the SSI-3 (Riley, 1994).5 Participants were classified as CWNS if they (a) exhibited two or fewer stuttered disfluencies per 100 words of conversational speech based on a 300-word sample, and (b) scored 10 or lower on the SSI-3. 2.4. Procedures Data collection for all participant.Ve measure of participants’ socioeconomic status (SES). This index takes into account both parents’ educational levels, occupation, and marital status, based on self report. Computed scores ranged from 8 to 66, with a higher score indicating a higher socioeconomic status. 2.2. Measurement of speech fluency Measurement of participants’ speech fluency was based on a 300-word conversational speech sample, obtained during free play between the child and the examiner, and scores on the Stuttering Severity Instrument-3 (SSI-3; Riley, 1994). Scores on the SSI-3 were based on one continuous 300-word conversational speech sample. All disfluency and word counts were obtained in real-time with the examiner noting the disfluent and fluent words on a disfluency count sheet (Conture, 2001) while playing and conversing with the child. Present study guidelines for assessing speech disfluencies were such that only one disfluency type (e.g., sound/syllable repetition) could be applied to a single word. If two or more stuttered disfluencies (for examples, see below) occurred on the same word (e.g., disfluency cluster “sound prolongation + sound/syllable repetition”), only one instance of stuttered disfluency, that is, the first disfluency to occur on the word, was documented/4Apparent between-group difference in gender as well as other relevant variables (e.g., age) will be accounted for in statistical model presented in Section 3. J Commun Disord. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 May 01.Tumanova et al.Pagecounted for. Phrase repetitions or revisions (which are classified in this study as nonstuttered/normal disfluencies; for examples, see below) occur on units larger than single words. Thus, if a stuttered and a non-stuttered disfluency occurred within the same phrase (e.g., a sound prolongation on one word of phrase revision), both were counted (see Yaruss, 1998a,b). All examiner-child interactions were audio-video recorded for several purposes, including inter- and intra-judge measurement reliability, to be described below. 2.3. Classification and inclusion criteria All participants’ speech-language and hearing abilities were assessed using standardized measures. In particular, the “Sounds in Words” subtest of the Goldman ristoe Test of Articulation-2 (GFTA-2; Goldman Fristoe, 2000) assessed children’s articulation. Receptive vocabulary was measured using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition (PPVT-4; Dunn Dunn, 2007). Expressive vocabulary was measured using the Expressive Vocabulary Test (EVT-2; Williams, 2007). Receptive and expressive language abilities of the participants were evaluated using the Test of Early Language Development-3 (TELD-3; Hresko, Reid, Hammill, 1999). In addition, all participants received a bilateral pure tone hearing screening to rule out hearing impairments. Participants were assigned to the CWS group if they (a) exhibited three or more stuttered disfluencies (i.e., sound/syllable repetitions, sound prolongations, or monosyllabic wholeword repetitions) per 100 words of conversational speech (Conture, 2001; Yaruss, 1998a,b) based on a 300-word speech sample, and (b) scored 11 or greater (i.e., severity of at least “mild”) on the SSI-3 (Riley, 1994).5 Participants were classified as CWNS if they (a) exhibited two or fewer stuttered disfluencies per 100 words of conversational speech based on a 300-word sample, and (b) scored 10 or lower on the SSI-3. 2.4. Procedures Data collection for all participant.
