To almost all other age groups (exceptAge group/Group mean in log2 scale 0? March September Difference P-value Bonferroni Adjusted P-value 3.769 3.6?5 3.451 3.16?5 4.020 3.463 0.557 0.001 0.26?9 3.872 3.472 0.401 0.012 0.60 4.390 3.898 0.492 0.011 0.Table 10. Multivariate regression output: 2009 H1N1 order IQ-1 antibody against gender, age, and seasonal influenza antibodies (log transformed scale).Covariates (Constant) Gender AgeBeta 2.287 2.008 .002 .288 2.068 .045 2.Std. Err .126 .069 .002 .037 .040 .033 .t 18.096 2.117 1.p-value .000 .907 .131 .000 .090 .175 .20.105 0.379 0.495 1 0.015 0.H1NH3N2 B.Y B.V7.21.698 1.356 2.Except for the 0? age group, all other age groups showed significantly decreased antibody levels of B/V during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic compared to before the pandemic, using t-test. *boldface indicates an increased antibody level in September compared to that in March. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053847.tdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053847.tInfluenza Antibodies Reaction during 2009 H1N60 age group in A/H1N1), in which the antibody level decreased. Cross-reactivity of the old and the new H1N1 antibody might be particularly strong in the 0? age group 25331948 and the 60 age group. It also suggested that the youngest group had an especially high risk of being attacked both by the seasonal influenza and the 2009 H1N1 influenza during its pandemic. For all types of seasonal influenza, the 16?5 age group had the smallest decline in antibody levels during the pandemic compared to before the outbreak. The 0? age group data is especially valuable because in many studies this data is not available. The median infected cases’ age was around 40 [21,23,24], and the swine flu is understood to spread most virulently among young people. Consistent with our findings, in studies where the kindergarten children’s serological data are available, reports show that the 0? age group is still the primary risk population with the highest antibody response [25,26,27]. This study shows that during the 2009 H1N1 virus pandemic, all other seasonal influenza (A/H3N2, B/Y and B/Y) infections were suppressed. Based on the similarity of antigens between 2009 H1N1 and seasonal H1N1, it was also possible to posit that antibodies against the seasonal H1N1 could cross-react with sH1N1 and protected those exposed to the 2009 sH1N1. A multivariate analysis of 2009 H1N1 antibody titer with the 4 types of seasonal antibody titers resulted that the seasonal H1N1 influenza was the only significant (p-value ,1025) predictor of the pandemic antibody. The immunity generated in those who were newly exposed to the seasonal influenza viruses could possibly have played an important role in combating the 2009 sH1N1. We have also shown a high antibody response to all seasonal influenza viruses in the 0? age group during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic; hence, MedChemExpress Bromopyruvic acid vaccination against merely a new strain of flu may not be enough to protect the youngest age group during a new flu epidemic, but should be added to the existing seasonal influenza vaccination. Besides vaccination, extra protection such as early closure of day centers and primary schools should be carried out [28]. In future work, it would be informative to obtain the immunological response to the 2009 H1N1 before, during and after the outbreak, so that the pattern of its association to the seasonal H1N1 antibody could be studied, and prevention procedure, not only to the new influenza, but also to the existing seasonal ones, could be exercised.(D.To almost all other age groups (exceptAge group/Group mean in log2 scale 0? March September Difference P-value Bonferroni Adjusted P-value 3.769 3.6?5 3.451 3.16?5 4.020 3.463 0.557 0.001 0.26?9 3.872 3.472 0.401 0.012 0.60 4.390 3.898 0.492 0.011 0.Table 10. Multivariate regression output: 2009 H1N1 antibody against gender, age, and seasonal influenza antibodies (log transformed scale).Covariates (Constant) Gender AgeBeta 2.287 2.008 .002 .288 2.068 .045 2.Std. Err .126 .069 .002 .037 .040 .033 .t 18.096 2.117 1.p-value .000 .907 .131 .000 .090 .175 .20.105 0.379 0.495 1 0.015 0.H1NH3N2 B.Y B.V7.21.698 1.356 2.Except for the 0? age group, all other age groups showed significantly decreased antibody levels of B/V during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic compared to before the pandemic, using t-test. *boldface indicates an increased antibody level in September compared to that in March. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053847.tdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053847.tInfluenza Antibodies Reaction during 2009 H1N60 age group in A/H1N1), in which the antibody level decreased. Cross-reactivity of the old and the new H1N1 antibody might be particularly strong in the 0? age group 25331948 and the 60 age group. It also suggested that the youngest group had an especially high risk of being attacked both by the seasonal influenza and the 2009 H1N1 influenza during its pandemic. For all types of seasonal influenza, the 16?5 age group had the smallest decline in antibody levels during the pandemic compared to before the outbreak. The 0? age group data is especially valuable because in many studies this data is not available. The median infected cases’ age was around 40 [21,23,24], and the swine flu is understood to spread most virulently among young people. Consistent with our findings, in studies where the kindergarten children’s serological data are available, reports show that the 0? age group is still the primary risk population with the highest antibody response [25,26,27]. This study shows that during the 2009 H1N1 virus pandemic, all other seasonal influenza (A/H3N2, B/Y and B/Y) infections were suppressed. Based on the similarity of antigens between 2009 H1N1 and seasonal H1N1, it was also possible to posit that antibodies against the seasonal H1N1 could cross-react with sH1N1 and protected those exposed to the 2009 sH1N1. A multivariate analysis of 2009 H1N1 antibody titer with the 4 types of seasonal antibody titers resulted that the seasonal H1N1 influenza was the only significant (p-value ,1025) predictor of the pandemic antibody. The immunity generated in those who were newly exposed to the seasonal influenza viruses could possibly have played an important role in combating the 2009 sH1N1. We have also shown a high antibody response to all seasonal influenza viruses in the 0? age group during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic; hence, vaccination against merely a new strain of flu may not be enough to protect the youngest age group during a new flu epidemic, but should be added to the existing seasonal influenza vaccination. Besides vaccination, extra protection such as early closure of day centers and primary schools should be carried out [28]. In future work, it would be informative to obtain the immunological response to the 2009 H1N1 before, during and after the outbreak, so that the pattern of its association to the seasonal H1N1 antibody could be studied, and prevention procedure, not only to the new influenza, but also to the existing seasonal ones, could be exercised.(D.
