Ometry (cell shape and 
nuclear shape) from real 2D Imazamox site slices of the microtubule and nucleus channels. (A) Example of a real 2D cell image (tubulin channel) and its approximate bottom shape. (B) Cartoon of an X-Z projection of a cell on a substrate. (C) Example of a generated 3D cell shape containing 8 stacks (1.6 microns). (D) Illustration of inputs and outputs for the procedure. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050292.gComparing Microtubule Distributions Across Eleven Cell LinesComparing 
bivariate distributions of the number of microtubules and the mean of length. We compared thebivariate distribution of the estimated number of microtubules and the mean of length across different cell lines. We first compared the covariances using Box’s M test. The p-value for this comparison was<0 which indicates that we can readily reject the null hypothesis of homogeneity of covariances. Next, we used the pairwise Hotelling's T2 test to test whether there were significant differences between the bivariate means of the distributions between cell lines. Because there is strong imbalance of the number of cells among different cell lines, we repeated the pairwise testing 100 times each for subsamples of 35 cells (the minimum number of cells for a cell line) for every cell line and then theminimum p-Mirin values from the repeats (after Bonferroni correction) were reported. All the pairwise p-values were then adjusted using family-wise Bonferroni correction for multiple testing [10]. We show the p-values in the lower triangular part of Table 3, and the ones denoted with “*” indicate significant differences. In addition, given the Hotelling’s T2 statistics, we built a hierarchical clustering tree shown in Figure 7 (A), and the rows and columns of the lower triangular part of Table 3 are sorted according to the tree.Comparing multivariate distributions of numerical features on real images. As a comparison to these statisticaltests of indirect parameter estimates, we repeated the calculations mentioned above using features calculated directly from real cell images. We used the first two principal components, which accounted for 99.99 of the total variance in feature space, to represent the multivariate features. The p-value for covarianceTable 1. Comparisons of estimated parameters of distribution of microtubules between original 3D 23727046 HeLa images and their 2D central slices.Number of microtubules 23.9619.Mean of 1326631 length distribution 43.1623.Collinearity (cosa) 1.9662.Cell Height 21.4613.The values in the second row are MAPEs of the recoveries of parameters from the 2D slices, assuming that the parameter estimates from the 3D images are correct. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050292.tComparison of Microtubule DistributionsTable 2. Estimated accuracies of recovery of model parameters from synthetic 2D images in the simulation experiment.Library 1 2 3 4Number of microtubules 4.3269.95 4.89611.9 3.9669.53 4.10610.6 3.6268.Mean of length distribution 5.52611.1 8.52624.2 6.24617.9 4.63610.6 5.08611.Collinearity 0.6160.82 0.5860.78 0.6860.86 0.5760.76 0.6160.Numbers shown for the parameters are MAPEs between the values used to synthesize an image in the validation bed and the estimated values obtained from matching of that image in the testing libraries. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050292.thomogeneity test was<0. The p-values for the pairwise Hotelling's T2 test of bivariate means of distribution of the first two principal components (to represent multivariate means of the distribution o.Ometry (cell shape and nuclear shape) from real 2D slices of the microtubule and nucleus channels. (A) Example of a real 2D cell image (tubulin channel) and its approximate bottom shape. (B) Cartoon of an X-Z projection of a cell on a substrate. (C) Example of a generated 3D cell shape containing 8 stacks (1.6 microns). (D) Illustration of inputs and outputs for the procedure. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050292.gComparing Microtubule Distributions Across Eleven Cell LinesComparing bivariate distributions of the number of microtubules and the mean of length. We compared thebivariate distribution of the estimated number of microtubules and the mean of length across different cell lines. We first compared the covariances using Box's M test. The p-value for this comparison was<0 which indicates that we can readily reject the null hypothesis of homogeneity of covariances. Next, we used the pairwise Hotelling's T2 test to test whether there were significant differences between the bivariate means of the distributions between cell lines. Because there is strong imbalance of the number of cells among different cell lines, we repeated the pairwise testing 100 times each for subsamples of 35 cells (the minimum number of cells for a cell line) for every cell line and then theminimum p-values from the repeats (after Bonferroni correction) were reported. All the pairwise p-values were then adjusted using family-wise Bonferroni correction for multiple testing [10]. We show the p-values in the lower triangular part of Table 3, and the ones denoted with ``*'' indicate significant differences. In addition, given the Hotelling's T2 statistics, we built a hierarchical clustering tree shown in Figure 7 (A), and the rows and columns of the lower triangular part of Table 3 are sorted according to the tree.Comparing multivariate distributions of numerical features on real images. As a comparison to these statisticaltests of indirect parameter estimates, we repeated the calculations mentioned above using features calculated directly from real cell images. We used the first two principal components, which accounted for 99.99 of the total variance in feature space, to represent the multivariate features. The p-value for covarianceTable 1. Comparisons of estimated parameters of distribution of microtubules between original 3D 23727046 HeLa images and their 2D central slices.Number of microtubules 23.9619.Mean of 1326631 length distribution 43.1623.Collinearity (cosa) 1.9662.Cell Height 21.4613.The values in the second row are MAPEs of the recoveries of parameters from the 2D slices, assuming that the parameter estimates from the 3D images are correct. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050292.tComparison of Microtubule DistributionsTable 2. Estimated accuracies of recovery of model parameters from synthetic 2D images in the simulation experiment.Library 1 2 3 4Number of microtubules 4.3269.95 4.89611.9 3.9669.53 4.10610.6 3.6268.Mean of length distribution 5.52611.1 8.52624.2 6.24617.9 4.63610.6 5.08611.Collinearity 0.6160.82 0.5860.78 0.6860.86 0.5760.76 0.6160.Numbers shown for the parameters are MAPEs between the values used to synthesize an image in the validation bed and the estimated values obtained from matching of that image in the testing libraries. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050292.thomogeneity test was<0. The p-values for the pairwise Hotelling's T2 test of bivariate means of distribution of the first two principal components (to represent multivariate means of the distribution o.
