Mutants [29], indicating that these two late viral steps are impacting on the timing of RTion. Structural features of NC tend to be conserved among retroviruses [47]. However, unlike most retroviruses that harbor two ZF motifs, the gammaretroviruses such as MuLV have only one ZF. This feature also distinguishes spumaretroviruses, DNAcontaining viruses, which have no NC ZF motif. Also the primary structure of MuLV NC is different from that of HIV-1 since it is more basic. Such MuLV NC unique features prompted us to examine MuLV NC activities by mutating the N-terminal basic residues and the unique ZF motif and monitoring their impact on the late events of MuLV replication. The present study showed that MuLV basic residues are an essential component for virus assembly and gRNA packaging (Fig 2 and 4) and that MuLV (Fig. 4) and HIV-1 [43] ZFs appear to play equivalent role in gRNA packaging. Moreover, we recently reported that mutating basic residues or the ZF of HIV-1 NC resulted in virions containing large amounts of newly made viral DNA, which was generated by RTion of the gRNA before virus release (late RTion) [43]. Such correlation 
between gRNA and DNA levels was investigated in MuLV NC mutants. We found major differences between MuLV and HIV-1 NC for the temporal control of RTionduring virus assembly. Unlike HIV-1, mutations of NC’s basic residues or ZF did not turn MuLV into a DNA-containing virus. Only short ss-cDNA forms were found in MuLV particles but not in MuLV producer cells, while intermediate or full-length RTion 
GW-0742 biological activity products remained undetectable (Fig 4C). The viral ss-cDNA synthesis was CP21 likely initiated after virus release. It is known that RTion can initiate in newly made viruses. Such natural endogenous RTion activity (NERT) activity produces mainly sscDNA, probably because retroviral particles contain insufficient levels of deoxynucleotide triphosphates to complete synthesis of long cDNA products [23,48,49]. Moreover, our experiments with MuLV and HIV-1 coexpression (Fig 5) showed for the first time that the DZF2 HIV mutant negatively interfered with MuLV assembly or release, but could not promote late RTion in MuLV. Interestingly, MuLV NC restricted the late RTion activity of the DZF2 HIV mutant. Consequently, MuLV NC seems to modulate late RTion during assembly of MuLV and HIV-1. Altogether, these results imply that the late RTion and the virus assembly are two linked events. Why late RTion can take place during assembly of HIV-1 NC mutants but not in the case of MuLV NC mutants? Yet it is not known whether HIV-1 NC 1516647 directly or indirectly controls the timing of late RTion. As a simple gammaretrovirus, MuLV might miss a cofactor essential for the temporal control of RTion during assembly. In addition, MuLV and HIV-1 NC proteins exhibit differences in their overall chaperone activities in vitro, with a higher activity for HIV-1 NC compared to MuLV NC [42,50]. Furthermore, HIV-1 NC can directly interact with the RT enzyme promoting RTion processivity [51,52]. Such NC/RT interactions have never been reported for MuLV replicative nucleoprotein complexes. One explanation could also rely on the gRNA capacities to adopt particular conformation that regulates viral functions. For instance HIV-1 gRNA forms U5:AUGRoles of the NC in HIV-1 and MuLV Replicationsinteraction that promotes NC binding and RNA packaging [53]. Such long-distance base-pairing was not reported in the MuLV gRNA [16]. Another explanation might rely on differenc.Mutants [29], indicating that these two late viral steps are impacting on the timing of RTion. Structural features of NC tend to be conserved among retroviruses [47]. However, unlike most retroviruses that harbor two ZF motifs, the gammaretroviruses such as MuLV have only one ZF. This feature also distinguishes spumaretroviruses, DNAcontaining viruses, which have no NC ZF motif. Also the primary structure of MuLV NC is different from that of HIV-1 since it is more basic. Such MuLV NC unique features prompted us to examine MuLV NC activities by mutating the N-terminal basic residues and the unique ZF motif and monitoring their impact on the late events of MuLV replication. The present study showed that MuLV basic residues are an essential component for virus assembly and gRNA packaging (Fig 2 and 4) and that MuLV (Fig. 4) and HIV-1 [43] ZFs appear to play equivalent role in gRNA packaging. Moreover, we recently reported that mutating basic residues or the ZF of HIV-1 NC resulted in virions containing large amounts of newly made viral DNA, which was generated by RTion of the gRNA before virus release (late RTion) [43]. Such correlation between gRNA and DNA levels was investigated in MuLV NC mutants. We found major differences between MuLV and HIV-1 NC for the temporal control of RTionduring virus assembly. Unlike HIV-1, mutations of NC’s basic residues or ZF did not turn MuLV into a DNA-containing virus. Only short ss-cDNA forms were found in MuLV particles but not in MuLV producer cells, while intermediate or full-length RTion products remained undetectable (Fig 4C). The viral ss-cDNA synthesis was likely initiated after virus release. It is known that RTion can initiate in newly made viruses. Such natural endogenous RTion activity (NERT) activity produces mainly sscDNA, probably because retroviral particles contain insufficient levels of deoxynucleotide triphosphates to complete synthesis of long cDNA products [23,48,49]. Moreover, our experiments with MuLV and HIV-1 coexpression (Fig 5) showed for the first time that the DZF2 HIV mutant negatively interfered with MuLV assembly or release, but could not promote late RTion in MuLV. Interestingly, MuLV NC restricted the late RTion activity of the DZF2 HIV mutant. Consequently, MuLV NC seems to modulate late RTion during assembly of MuLV and HIV-1. Altogether, these results imply that the late RTion and the virus assembly are two linked events. Why late RTion can take place during assembly of HIV-1 NC mutants but not in the case of MuLV NC mutants? Yet it is not known whether HIV-1 NC 1516647 directly or indirectly controls the timing of late RTion. As a simple gammaretrovirus, MuLV might miss a cofactor essential for the temporal control of RTion during assembly. In addition, MuLV and HIV-1 NC proteins exhibit differences in their overall chaperone activities in vitro, with a higher activity for HIV-1 NC compared to MuLV NC [42,50]. Furthermore, HIV-1 NC can directly interact with the RT enzyme promoting RTion processivity [51,52]. Such NC/RT interactions have never been reported for MuLV replicative nucleoprotein complexes. One explanation could also rely on the gRNA capacities to adopt particular conformation that regulates viral functions. For instance HIV-1 gRNA forms U5:AUGRoles of the NC in HIV-1 and MuLV Replicationsinteraction that promotes NC binding and RNA packaging [53]. Such long-distance base-pairing was not reported in the MuLV gRNA [16]. Another explanation might rely on differenc.
