ifically after 10 ns of run XXX_1 and after 10 and 20 ns of run XXX_2, where XXX is either WT or one of the mutations. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045207.t001 
discrepancy is probably due to contacts between the two molecules found in the crystallographic unit and between neighboring cells. In general, there is qualitatively good agreement between the simulations and the crystallographic data concerning backbone flexibility validating that the runs sampled the conformational space of the folded state. The trajectories were further analysed to estimate whether the three type 2A mutations cause a local destabilization of the A2 domain. Two types of analysis were performed for this purpose. First, statistical comparison of the Ca RMSF of the C-terminal helix, a6, revealed the presence of larger fluctuations in the simulations with the L1657I and I1628T mutants compared with the wild-type simulations. No statistically significant differences were observed with the E1638K mutant across the protein. Second, the interaction energy between the mutated side chains and the rest of the protein or the rest of the simulated system was averaged over the sampled trajectories in order to detect local changes in enthalpy due to the mutations. For all of the mutants, there was an increase in the total interaction energy compared to the wild-type indicating that the mutations are enthalpically unfavorable. The side chains of residues Leu1657 and Ile1628 are located in a hydrophobic core which is shielded from the solvent by the C-terminal helix. Thus mutating these side chains is likely to cause a destabilization of the hydrophobic packing. On the other hand, the mutation E1638K, located on the surface of helix a5, introduces a positively charged side chain next to Arg1641, which is probably the reason for the higher coulombic energy. It can be concluded that the mutations cause a local kinetic destabilization of the A2 domain native state, although the mechanism of destabilization might be different for E1638K than for L1657I or I1628T. The calculation of the interaction energy and of the Ca RMSF has been previously successfully used to identify stabilizing mutations in the C-terminal region of designed ankyrin repeat 62717-42-4 web proteins. Tensile force induced unfolding simulations Starting from snapshots sampled during the 300 K runs, simulations were performed with an applied tensile force aimed at stretching the protein. The C-terminus of the A2 domain was pulled at constant velocity from the N-terminus whose coordinates were held fixed. Three runs were started for each of the mutants and the wild-type, for in total 12 simulations. PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2221058 The goal was to understand whether the mutations lower the force resistance of the A2 domain. The advantage of constant velocity versus constant force pulling simulations is that in the former the force ramps up until a breaking event occurs, after which the force usually drops. In this way, it is possible to monitor the presence of kinetic barriers in the force-induced unfolding pathway. Generally, if pulling is performed slowly enough, the direction of force is not relevant. Nonetheless, one simulation was performed where the N-terminus was pulled and a qualitatively similar sequence of events was observed as pulling from the C-terminus. General description of the unfolding pathway. In general, the sequence of major events during unfolding was qualitatively similar between the simulations with the wild-type and mutants and was characte
